<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Burn Notice: Double Booked</title>
	<atom:link href="http://remote.lohudblogs.com/2008/09/11/burn-notice-double-booked/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://remote.lohudblogs.com/2008/09/11/burn-notice-double-booked/</link>
	<description>The T.V. Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:25:40 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dube</title>
		<link>http://remote.lohudblogs.com/2008/09/11/burn-notice-double-booked/comment-page-1/#comment-45643</link>
		<dc:creator>Dube</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 16:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://remote.lohudblogs.com/2008/09/11/burn-notice-double-booked/#comment-45643</guid>
		<description>I agree with the commenter that Tricia Helfer&#039;s role was really overhyped. And to be honest, after the 3 week break, I had lost track of what this season&#039;s &quot;mystery&quot; was about and the steps we had taken to get there. So it wasn&#039;t that compelling to me either.

Now, if I&#039;m viewing this last episode as just a stand-alone episode, then it&#039;s probably my favorite of the season. I actually really laughed at some of the scenes and overall enjoyed it. 

So for a big overarching storyline, I can&#039;t rate this season well. But for this particular episode (if it were a standalone), it would&#039;ve been great.

I did like the scene where he was writing things he was thankful to his mom for, and #1 was &quot;Providing me with a cover ID.&quot; That was awesome. :-P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the commenter that Tricia Helfer&#8217;s role was really overhyped. And to be honest, after the 3 week break, I had lost track of what this season&#8217;s &#8220;mystery&#8221; was about and the steps we had taken to get there. So it wasn&#8217;t that compelling to me either.</p>
<p>Now, if I&#8217;m viewing this last episode as just a stand-alone episode, then it&#8217;s probably my favorite of the season. I actually really laughed at some of the scenes and overall enjoyed it. </p>
<p>So for a big overarching storyline, I can&#8217;t rate this season well. But for this particular episode (if it were a standalone), it would&#8217;ve been great.</p>
<p>I did like the scene where he was writing things he was thankful to his mom for, and #1 was &#8220;Providing me with a cover ID.&#8221; That was awesome. <img src='http://remote.lohudblogs.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':-P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FanBoyWonder</title>
		<link>http://remote.lohudblogs.com/2008/09/11/burn-notice-double-booked/comment-page-1/#comment-45230</link>
		<dc:creator>FanBoyWonder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 13:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://remote.lohudblogs.com/2008/09/11/burn-notice-double-booked/#comment-45230</guid>
		<description>Amy,

You are feeling the same thing that Iâ€™m feeling about Burn Noticeâ€”while Iâ€™m watching it, itâ€™s an amusing waste of time but Iâ€™m not feeling a lot of excitement for it otherwise.

USA goes THREE WEEKS between episodes to deliver what looks to be a lackluster season finale to a lackluster season. I was shocked when they announced the season finale-â€œwhat already?â€ I thought. Iâ€™d been waiting for the season to pick up speed and now itâ€™s almost over.

Tricia Helferâ€™s role as Carla was over-hyped and under-delivered. Here total screen time to date wouldnâ€™t amount to a quarter-hour of a single episode. Which is too bad as too bad, Helferâ€™s role as Natalie Six on Battlestar Galactica (as opposed to Caprica Six) got me excited to see Helfer play someone NOT the overt, in-your-face sexpot.

The bottom line is that Season 2 of Burn Notice was new but not terribly different. Itâ€™s more like everything to date has been Burn Notice Season 1 split up over two summers. 

This show is stagnating and hasnâ€™t grown beyond its very clever premise and introduction. This is by no means a bad show but it seems like Team Burn Notice is doing its best to be mediocre when it could easily be SO MUCH Better.

Hereâ€™s hoping next weekâ€™s finale leaves us wanting more.

Cheers,
FanBoyWonder</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amy,</p>
<p>You are feeling the same thing that Iâ€™m feeling about Burn Noticeâ€”while Iâ€™m watching it, itâ€™s an amusing waste of time but Iâ€™m not feeling a lot of excitement for it otherwise.</p>
<p>USA goes THREE WEEKS between episodes to deliver what looks to be a lackluster season finale to a lackluster season. I was shocked when they announced the season finale-â€œwhat already?â€ I thought. Iâ€™d been waiting for the season to pick up speed and now itâ€™s almost over.</p>
<p>Tricia Helferâ€™s role as Carla was over-hyped and under-delivered. Here total screen time to date wouldnâ€™t amount to a quarter-hour of a single episode. Which is too bad as too bad, Helferâ€™s role as Natalie Six on Battlestar Galactica (as opposed to Caprica Six) got me excited to see Helfer play someone NOT the overt, in-your-face sexpot.</p>
<p>The bottom line is that Season 2 of Burn Notice was new but not terribly different. Itâ€™s more like everything to date has been Burn Notice Season 1 split up over two summers. </p>
<p>This show is stagnating and hasnâ€™t grown beyond its very clever premise and introduction. This is by no means a bad show but it seems like Team Burn Notice is doing its best to be mediocre when it could easily be SO MUCH Better.</p>
<p>Hereâ€™s hoping next weekâ€™s finale leaves us wanting more.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
FanBoyWonder</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
