<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Putting their money where their hearts are, Chuck fans tell the inspiration behind the Have a Heart campaign</title>
	<atom:link href="http://remote.lohudblogs.com/2009/05/14/putting-their-money-where-their-hearts-are-chuck-fans-tell-the-inspiration-behind-the-have-a-heart-campaign/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://remote.lohudblogs.com/2009/05/14/putting-their-money-where-their-hearts-are-chuck-fans-tell-the-inspiration-behind-the-have-a-heart-campaign/</link>
	<description>The T.V. Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:25:40 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Esprit15d</title>
		<link>http://remote.lohudblogs.com/2009/05/14/putting-their-money-where-their-hearts-are-chuck-fans-tell-the-inspiration-behind-the-have-a-heart-campaign/comment-page-1/#comment-59404</link>
		<dc:creator>Esprit15d</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 12:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://remote.lohudblogs.com/?p=8861#comment-59404</guid>
		<description>Love the campaign and I contributed $5.  That said, this writer gave us fans a little too much credit: 

*No, fans didn’t inundate the network with nuts or other snack food: FALSE; I sent my Nerds week before last to the head of NBC programming
*They didn’t lash out at the network in a dizzying series of online tirades across message boards, chatrooms and Twitter feeds: Patently FALSE; are you kidding me?  I&#039;ve seen post-modern rants that went on for pages.
*They didn’t even hang their heads in resignation:  Wait for it...TRUE.  This we have not done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love the campaign and I contributed $5.  That said, this writer gave us fans a little too much credit: </p>
<p>*No, fans didn’t inundate the network with nuts or other snack food: FALSE; I sent my Nerds week before last to the head of NBC programming</p>
<p>*They didn’t lash out at the network in a dizzying series of online tirades across message boards, chatrooms and Twitter feeds: Patently FALSE; are you kidding me?  I&#8217;ve seen post-modern rants that went on for pages.</p>
<p>*They didn’t even hang their heads in resignation:  Wait for it&#8230;TRUE.  This we have not done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://remote.lohudblogs.com/2009/05/14/putting-their-money-where-their-hearts-are-chuck-fans-tell-the-inspiration-behind-the-have-a-heart-campaign/comment-page-1/#comment-59212</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 20:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://remote.lohudblogs.com/?p=8861#comment-59212</guid>
		<description>Awesome idea - and I&#039;m glad that the Chuck renewal effort is doing some good in addition to trying to get the show renewed.

One quibble though (from the statistician in me) - &quot;if 20,000 Nielsen families represent 304,000,000 people, then 350 Chuck donors would represent 5,320,000 people&quot; is an incredible abuse of statistics.  The reason 20,000 Neilson families can represent 304 million households is because it is a random sample.  If 20,000 random people were asked if they&#039;d donated to the AHA to support Chuck and 350 did, then you could claim that it represents 5.3 million - but getting 350 highly motivated Chuck fans to donate doesn&#039;t equate to 5.3 million people through any reasonable logic.

My statistical complaint aside though - I think its and awesome campaign and am glad you&#039;re promoting it here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome idea &#8211; and I&#8217;m glad that the Chuck renewal effort is doing some good in addition to trying to get the show renewed.</p>
<p>One quibble though (from the statistician in me) &#8211; &#8220;if 20,000 Nielsen families represent 304,000,000 people, then 350 Chuck donors would represent 5,320,000 people&#8221; is an incredible abuse of statistics.  The reason 20,000 Neilson families can represent 304 million households is because it is a random sample.  If 20,000 random people were asked if they&#8217;d donated to the AHA to support Chuck and 350 did, then you could claim that it represents 5.3 million &#8211; but getting 350 highly motivated Chuck fans to donate doesn&#8217;t equate to 5.3 million people through any reasonable logic.</p>
<p>My statistical complaint aside though &#8211; I think its and awesome campaign and am glad you&#8217;re promoting it here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nessa</title>
		<link>http://remote.lohudblogs.com/2009/05/14/putting-their-money-where-their-hearts-are-chuck-fans-tell-the-inspiration-behind-the-have-a-heart-campaign/comment-page-1/#comment-59202</link>
		<dc:creator>Nessa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 17:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://remote.lohudblogs.com/?p=8861#comment-59202</guid>
		<description>This is awesome! And I&#039;m honored, proud and ecstatic that I am part of the whole Save Chuck Campaign! Someone should really call their local news and say, hey, look what Chuck fans are doing! They&#039;re loyal fans, with loyal and great hearts . . . they&#039;re giving to a wonderful charity and we need your help :D That would be, literally, awesome!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is awesome! And I&#8217;m honored, proud and ecstatic that I am part of the whole Save Chuck Campaign! Someone should really call their local news and say, hey, look what Chuck fans are doing! They&#8217;re loyal fans, with loyal and great hearts . . . they&#8217;re giving to a wonderful charity and we need your help <img src='http://remote.lohudblogs.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  That would be, literally, awesome!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
